skip to main content
Ngôn ngữ:
Giới hạn tìm kiếm: Giới hạn tìm kiếm: Dạng tài nguyên Hiển thị kết quả với: Hiển thị kết quả với: Chỉ mục

Sexual Partner Typologies Among Single Young Men Who Have Sex with Men

Bauermeister, José A.

AIDS and Behavior, 6/2015, Vol.19(6), pp.1116-1128 [Tạp chí có phản biện]

ISSN: 1090-7165 ; E-ISSN: 1573-3254 ; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0932-7

Toàn văn sẵn có

Trích dẫn Trích dẫn bởi
  • Nhan đề:
    Sexual Partner Typologies Among Single Young Men Who Have Sex with Men
  • Tác giả: Bauermeister, José A.
  • Chủ đề: Gay Men – Health Aspects ; HIV Infections – Prevention ; HIV Infections – Risk Factors ; Self Efficacy – Analysis
  • Là 1 phần của: AIDS and Behavior, 6/2015, Vol.19(6), pp.1116-1128
  • Mô tả: Byline: Jose A. Bauermeister (1) Keywords: Love; Limerence; Ideation; Gay; Self-efficacy Abstract: Using data from a sample of single young men who have sex with men (N = 1,359, ages 18--24, 65 % White, 93 % gay), we examined whether the number of unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) partners with differed across relationship typologies (e.g., friends with benefits, hookups, romantic interests). We then examined how safer sex self-efficacy, decisional balance to forego condoms, ideal relationship attributes (i.e., intimacy, passion and commitment), and limerence were associated with UAI. Different partner types were associated with greater UAI partners single partner types were associated with fewer UAI partners, irrespective of how they were categorized. UAI partners was associated with decisional balance (OR = 1.89, p < 0.001), passion ideation (OR = 1.38, p < 0.001), and difficulty negotiating safer sex with romantic partners (OR = 1.16, p < 0.001). Odds of UAI partners decreased with higher scores of commitment ideation (OR = 0.91, p < 0.05) and difficulty negotiating safer sex with casual partners (OR = 0.96, p < 0.05). We discuss the importance of acknowledging how different sexual partnerships, alongside its motivational correlates, influence UAI risk in order to inform HIV-prevention interventions. Abstract (Spanish): Utilizando datos de una muestra de jovenes entre las edades de 18-24 anos (N = 1,359 65 % blancos 93 % homosexuales), examinamos si el numero de parejas de sexo anal sin condon (UAI) diferia basado en el tipo de pareja (amigos con beneficios, parejas casuales, intereses romanticos). Examinamos si el numero de parejas UAI estaba asociado con la autoeficacia sexual, balance decisional, atributos de la relacion ideal (intimidad, pasion y compromiso), y la infatuacion. El numero de parejas UAI es mayor entre jovenes indicando distintos tipos de pareja el numero de parejas UAI es menor cuando se indica un solo tipo de pareja sexual, independientemente de su clasificacion. El numero de parejas UAI esta asociado con balance decisional (OR = 1.89, p < 0.001), ideacion de pasion (OR = 1.38, p < 0.001), y dificultades en la autoeficacia con parejas romanticas (OR = 1.16, p < 0.001). El numero de parejas UAI esta negativamente asociado con la ideacion de compromiso (OR = 0.91, p < 0.05) y las dificultades de autoeficacia con parejas casuales (OR = 0.96, p < 0.05). Discutimos la importancia de reconocer como diferentes parejas sexuales, adjunto a sus motivaciones, influyen en el UAI de los jovenes con el fin de informar intervenciones para prevenir VIH. Author Affiliation: (1) Center for Sexuality and Health Disparities, Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, SPH I Room 3822, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2029, USA Article History: Registration Date: 23/10/2014 Online Date: 31/10/2014
  • Ngôn ngữ: English
  • Số nhận dạng: ISSN: 1090-7165 ; E-ISSN: 1573-3254 ; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0932-7

Đang tìm Cơ sở dữ liệu bên ngoài...