skip to main content
Ngôn ngữ:
Giới hạn tìm kiếm: Giới hạn tìm kiếm: Dạng tài nguyên Hiển thị kết quả với: Hiển thị kết quả với: Chỉ mục

Gene tree parsimony vs. uninode coding for phylogenetic reconstruction

Cotton, James A. ; Page, Roderic D.M.

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2003, Vol.29(2), pp.298-308 [Tạp chí có phản biện]

ISSN: 1055-7903 ; DOI: 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00109-X

Toàn văn sẵn có

Trích dẫn Trích dẫn bởi
  • Nhan đề:
    Gene tree parsimony vs. uninode coding for phylogenetic reconstruction
  • Tác giả: Cotton, James A. ; Page, Roderic D.M.
  • Chủ đề: Statistical Genetics ; Statistical Analysis ; Phylogeny ; Duplication ; Gene Duplictaion ; Taxonomy, Systematics and Evolutionary Genetics ; Gene Tree Parsimony ; Uninode Coding ; Gene Tree Parsimony ; Gene Duplictaion ; Uninode Coding
  • Là 1 phần của: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2003, Vol.29(2), pp.298-308
  • Mô tả: Simmons and Freudenstein (2002) have suggested that there are important weaknesses of gene tree parsimony in reconstructing phylogeny in the face of gene duplication, weaknesses that are addressed by Simmons et al.’s (2000) method of uninode coding. Here, we discuss Simmons and Freudenstein’s criticisms and suggest a number of reasons why gene tree parsimony is preferable to uninode coding. During this discussion we introduce a number of recent developments of gene tree parsimony methods overlooked by Simmons and Freudenstein. Finally, we present a re-analysis of data from Page (2000) that produces a more reasonable phylogeny than that found by Simmons and Freudenstein, suggesting that gene tree parsimony outperforms uninode coding, at least on these data.
  • Ngôn ngữ: English
  • Số nhận dạng: ISSN: 1055-7903 ; DOI: 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00109-X

Đang tìm Cơ sở dữ liệu bên ngoài...