skip to main content
Ngôn ngữ:
Giới hạn tìm kiếm: Giới hạn tìm kiếm: Dạng tài nguyên Hiển thị kết quả với: Hiển thị kết quả với: Chỉ mục

Perforierende Keratoplastik vs. "Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty" im Partnerauge : Funktionelle Ergebnisse und Patientenzufriedenheit.
Perforating keratoplasty versus Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in the partner eye: Functional results and patient satisfaction

Gross, N J ; Böhringer, D ; Maier, P ; Reinhard, T

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, October 2015, Vol.112(10), pp.848-53 [Tạp chí có phản biện]

E-ISSN: 1433-0423 ; PMID: 25943048 Version:1 ; DOI: 10.1007/s00347-015-0010-1

Toàn văn sẵn có

Trích dẫn Trích dẫn bởi
  • Perforierende Keratoplastik vs. "Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty" im Partnerauge : Funktionelle Ergebnisse und Patientenzufriedenheit.

  • Nhan đề:
    Perforating keratoplasty versus Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in the partner eye: Functional results and patient satisfaction
  • Tác giả: Gross, N J ; Böhringer, D ; Maier, P ; Reinhard, T
  • Chủ đề: Astigmatism ; Cornea ; Endothelial Cell Density ; Endothelial Dystrophy, Fuchs ; Visual Acuity ; Patient Satisfaction ; Visual Acuity ; Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty -- Methods ; Keratoplasty, Penetrating -- Methods ; Postoperative Complications -- Etiology ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted -- Methods
  • Là 1 phần của: Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, October 2015, Vol.112(10), pp.848-53
  • Mô tả: This study compared the postoperative results and patient satisfaction between penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in patients who underwent PK in one eye and DSAEK in the other eye. A total of 15 patients were identified from the corneal database register and the medical charts were analyzed for best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), keratometric astigmatism, endothelial cell density and postoperative complications. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by a standardized interview. Median follow-up time for PK was 55 months and 18 months for DSAEK (p < 0.01). Median BCVA in PK was 0.8 and 0.5 in DSAEK (p = 0.01) at the end of follow-up. Median keratometric astigmatism was 3.1 diopters after PK and 1.9 diopters after DSAEK (p = 0.2). Median endothelial cell density was 831 cells/mm(2) after PK and 860 cells/mm(2) after DSAEK (p = 0.63). For the interventions 57 % of the patients preferred PK, 36 % preferred DSAEK and 7 % were undecided. Patients assigned the better performing eye to the PK side in 64 % and in 29 % to the DSAEK side and 7 % perceived equal visual performance in both eyes. The results leave doubt about the superiority of DSAEK compared to PK; however, exceptionally good refractive results of the 15 PK eyes analyzed and significantly longer follow-up times after PK could be the reason for the unexpectedly high patient preference for PK.
  • Ngôn ngữ: German
  • Số nhận dạng: E-ISSN: 1433-0423 ; PMID: 25943048 Version:1 ; DOI: 10.1007/s00347-015-0010-1

Đang tìm Cơ sở dữ liệu bên ngoài...