skip to main content
Ngôn ngữ:
Giới hạn tìm kiếm: Giới hạn tìm kiếm: Dạng tài nguyên Hiển thị kết quả với: Hiển thị kết quả với: Chỉ mục

Preliminary evaluation of the pattern cutting and the ligating loop virtual laparoscopic trainers

Chellali, A ; Ahn, W ; Sankaranarayanan, G ; Flinn, J T ; Schwaitzberg, S D ; Jones, D B ; De, Suvranu ; Cao, C G L

Surgical endoscopy, April 2015, Vol.29(4), pp.815-21 [Tạp chí có phản biện]

E-ISSN: 1432-2218 ; PMID: 25159626 Version:1 ; DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3764-7

Toàn văn sẵn có

Trích dẫn Trích dẫn bởi
  • Nhan đề:
    Preliminary evaluation of the pattern cutting and the ligating loop virtual laparoscopic trainers
  • Tác giả: Chellali, A ; Ahn, W ; Sankaranarayanan, G ; Flinn, J T ; Schwaitzberg, S D ; Jones, D B ; De, Suvranu ; Cao, C G L
  • Chủ đề: Clinical Competence ; Computer Simulation ; Models, Educational ; User-Computer Interface ; Laparoscopy -- Education
  • Là 1 phần của: Surgical endoscopy, April 2015, Vol.29(4), pp.815-21
  • Mô tả: The Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) trainer is currently the standard for training and evaluating basic laparoscopic skills. However, its manual scoring system is time-consuming and subjective. The Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer (VBLaST©) is the virtual version of the FLS trainer which allows automatic and real time assessment of skill performance, as well as force feedback. In this study, the VBLaST© pattern cutting (VBLaST-PC©) and ligating loop (VBLaST-LL©) tasks were evaluated as part of a validation study. We hypothesized that performance would be similar on the FLS and VBLaST© trainers, and that subjects with more experience would perform better than those with less experience on both trainers. Fifty-five subjects with varying surgical experience were recruited at the Learning Center during the 2013 SAGES annual meeting and were divided into two groups: experts (PGY 5, surgical fellows and surgical attendings) and novices (PGY 1-4). They were asked to perform the PC or the ligating loop task on the FLS and the VBLaST© trainers. Their performance scores for each trainer were calculated and compared. There were no significant differences between the FLS and VBLaST© scores for either the PC or the ligating loop task. Experts' scores were significantly higher than the scores for novices on both trainers. This study showed that the subjects' performance on the VBLaST© trainer was similar to the FLS performance for both tasks. Both the VBLaST-PC© and the VBLaST-LL© tasks permitted discrimination between the novice and expert groups. Although concurrent and discriminant validity has been established, further studies to establish convergent and predictive validity are needed. Once validated as a training system for laparoscopic skills, the system is expected to overcome the current limitations of the FLS trainer.
  • Ngôn ngữ: English
  • Số nhận dạng: E-ISSN: 1432-2218 ; PMID: 25159626 Version:1 ; DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3764-7

Đang tìm Cơ sở dữ liệu bên ngoài...