skip to main content
Ngôn ngữ:
Giới hạn tìm kiếm: Giới hạn tìm kiếm: Dạng tài nguyên Hiển thị kết quả với: Hiển thị kết quả với: Chỉ mục

Asylum and State Sovereignty: A Comparison of the United States, Germany, and Britain

Joppke, Christian

Comparative Political Studies, June 1997, Vol.30(3), pp.259-298 [Tạp chí có phản biện]

ISSN: 0010-4140 ; E-ISSN: 1552-3829 ; DOI: 10.1177/0010414097030003001

Toàn văn không sẵn có

Trích dẫn Trích dẫn bởi
  • Nhan đề:
    Asylum and State Sovereignty: A Comparison of the United States, Germany, and Britain
  • Tác giả: Joppke, Christian
  • Chủ đề: Political Science
  • Là 1 phần của: Comparative Political Studies, June 1997, Vol.30(3), pp.259-298
  • Mô tả: Comparing the asylum policies of three Western states, this article argues against two claims raised in recent writings on international migration: that states' capacity of controlling unwanted migration is declining; and that such diminished control capacity is due to an international human rights regime restricting states' discretion over the admission and expulsion of aliens. This comparison suggests that there is an increasing willingness and capacity of states to control mass asylum seeking. State constraints in asylum policy arise more from domestic than from international legal norms. Asylum policies are everywhere shaped by the two increasingly conflicting principles of liberal nation-states: popular sovereignty and the protection of human rights.
  • Ngôn ngữ: English
  • Số nhận dạng: ISSN: 0010-4140 ; E-ISSN: 1552-3829 ; DOI: 10.1177/0010414097030003001

Đang tìm Cơ sở dữ liệu bên ngoài...