skip to main content
Ngôn ngữ:
Giới hạn tìm kiếm: Giới hạn tìm kiếm: Dạng tài nguyên Hiển thị kết quả với: Hiển thị kết quả với: Chỉ mục

Moral economies of the welfare state: A qualitative comparative study

Taylor-Gooby, Peter ; Hvinden, Bjørn ; Mau, Steffen ; Leruth, Benjamin ; Schoyen, Mi Ah ; Gyory, Adrienn

Acta Sociologica, May 2019, Vol.62(2), pp.119-134 [Tạp chí có phản biện]

ISSN: 0001-6993 ; E-ISSN: 1502-3869 ; DOI: 10.1177/0001699318774835

Toàn văn không sẵn có

Trích dẫn Trích dẫn bởi
  • Nhan đề:
    Moral economies of the welfare state: A qualitative comparative study
  • Tác giả: Taylor-Gooby, Peter ; Hvinden, Bjørn ; Mau, Steffen ; Leruth, Benjamin ; Schoyen, Mi Ah ; Gyory, Adrienn
  • Chủ đề: Attitudes ; Moral Economy ; Welfare State ; Europe ; Immigration ; Democratic Forum ; Inequality ; Neo-Liberalism ; Sociology & Social History
  • Là 1 phần của: Acta Sociologica, May 2019, Vol.62(2), pp.119-134
  • Mô tả: This paper uses innovative democratic forums carried out in Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom to examine people’s ideas about welfare-state priorities and future prospects. We use a moral economy framework in the context of regime differences and the move towards neo-liberalism across Europe. Broadly speaking, attitudes reflect regime differences, with distinctive emphasis on reciprocity and the value of work in Germany, inclusion and equality in Norway, and individual responsibility and the work-ethic in the UK. Neo-liberal market-centred ideas appear to have made little headway in regard to popular attitudes, except in the already liberal-leaning UK. There is also a striking assumption by UK participants that welfare is threatened externally by immigrants who take jobs from established workers and internally by the work-shy who undermine the work-ethic. A key role of the welfare state is repressive rather than enabling: to protect against threats to well-being rather than provide benefits for citizens. UK participants also anticipate major decline in state provision. In all three countries there is strong support for continuing and expanding social investment policies, but for different reasons: to enable contribution in Germany, to promote equality and mobility in Norway, and to facilitate self-responsibility in the UK.
  • Ngôn ngữ: English
  • Số nhận dạng: ISSN: 0001-6993 ; E-ISSN: 1502-3869 ; DOI: 10.1177/0001699318774835

Đang tìm Cơ sở dữ liệu bên ngoài...